How to quote custom machinery fast: automation for engineered equipment
How makers of custom machinery and industrial distributors cut quote time: reuse past jobs, price buyouts in parallel, and review only what is new.

In brief
To quote custom machinery fast, stop building each quote from a blank page. Start from the closest past job, pick options from a set list, and send buyout price requests to vendors on day one, not after engineering is done. Have engineering review only the parts that are new. Then let software fill in the BOM, the price build-up and the quote document. Software can draft all of that from the spec and your past jobs. The sales engineer still checks it, sets the price and sends it.
- Custom machinery quotes are slow mostly from waiting and retyping, not the engineering itself.
- Run buyout price requests in parallel with engineering review, not after it.
- Start every quote from the closest past job and a written option matrix.
- Send engineering only what is new. One CPQ vendor says routine configurations don't need a full review.
- Software drafts the BOM and the quote document. The sales engineer sets the price and sends it.
This guide is for companies that build machines, skids, conveyors, cranes, panels and other equipment to a customer's spec, and for distributors who quote engineered parts and assemblies. If you run a job shop quoting parts from drawings, see how to automate quoting for a machine shop. If you answer long line-item RFQs for stock items, see how to automate RFQ responses.
Why custom machinery quotes take days
A quote for a standard part is mostly a price lookup. A quote for engineered equipment is a small project. Someone has to read the spec, figure out what to build, decide what is new, build a bill of materials (BOM), get prices on parts you buy from others, set a lead time, and write it all up.
Most of the delay is not the thinking. It is the waiting and the retyping between steps. One CPQ vendor, Cincom, puts the core problem plainly: when sales lacks the technical data to quote a custom product, it must rely heavily on engineering, and that forces engineers to spend their time validating sales configurations and drafting BOMs by hand.
Where the days go
| Step | What happens | Typical bottleneck |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Intake | Read the spec, the RFQ email, drawings and site notes | Missing details, so the quote stalls on questions back to the customer |
| 2. Find a similar job | Look for the last time you built something close | Old jobs live in folders, old quotes and one person's memory |
| 3. Pick base and options | Choose the model, size, motor, controls, finish and extras | Only one or two people know which options work together |
| 4. Engineering review | Check that it can be built and what has to change | Quotes wait in line behind paying engineering work. The whole machine gets reviewed, not just the change. |
| 5. BOM and cost | Build the parts list and roll up material and labor | The last job's BOM is copied and edited by hand. Costs are out of date. |
| 6. Buyout pricing | Get prices and lead times on bought parts like drives, PLCs, gearboxes and hydraulics | Requests go out one at a time, often only after engineering is done |
| 7. Lead time | Set a ship date | Depends on the slowest buyout and on shop load nobody has in one place |
| 8. Price and approval | Set margin, get sign-off on big or unusual quotes | The approver is traveling or on the floor |
| 9. Quote document | Write the proposal with specs, drawings, terms and options | Copy and paste into last month's Word file, with old text left in |
| 10. Follow-up | Check in, revise, requote | Each revision repeats steps 5 to 9 |
Notice that steps 4 and 6 are both waiting steps, and they usually run one after the other. That is the biggest single place to win back time.
The fast-quote playbook
1. Write down your options as a matrix
Most "custom" machines are a base design plus a set of choices. List them: sizes, capacities, voltages, motor brands, control packages, guarding, paint, extras. For each pair that conflicts, write it down. For each choice that drives a price or a part, write that down too. This is your option matrix. A spreadsheet is fine to start. It turns knowledge in one person's head into something a new sales engineer, or software, can use.
2. Make the past-job lookup instant
Your best estimate is usually a job you already built. Tag past jobs by product family, size and key options, and link each one to its final BOM, cost, price and whether you won. When a new spec arrives, the first thing on screen should be the three closest past jobs, not an empty quote form.
3. Build BOM templates by product family
For each product family, keep a template BOM with the parts that change by option. Pick an option and its parts drop in. Pick a size and the quantities change. This is how ERP configurators work. Acumatica, for example, describes a rules-based configurator that can create a unique bill of material and routing for finished goods, with configured items on quotes copied to sales orders when the quote is converted.
4. Send buyout price requests in parallel
Do not wait for the full design to ask vendors for prices. As soon as the base and options are picked, you know most of the bought parts. Send price and lead time requests to your usual vendors the same day, all at once. Most ERPs can already do this. In NetSuite, a request for quote is emailed to vendors with a link to respond. In Dynamics 365, buyers can score and compare vendor bids, including how far each vendor's date is from the date you asked for. The hard part is the vendors who just reply by email. Something has to read those replies and put the price on the quote. That is where purchasing automation and quoting meet.
5. Send engineering only what is new
If most of a machine matches a past job, engineering should look only at the part that doesn't. Flag the new parts: a size you have never built, an option pair you have never combined, a customer spec that changes a load or a code requirement. Experlogix, a CPQ vendor, makes the same split. It says CPQ can let sellers quote routine configurations without requiring engineering to review every routine quote, while true engineer-to-order requests get routed to engineering. It also says CPQ can't promise every engineer-to-order request is buildable without technical review.
6. Generate the quote document
The proposal should build itself from the data: the right spec sheet for each option, the drawing, the price table, the terms and the lead time. Salesforce's CPQ training describes this kind of dynamic quote PDF, where columns, pages, sections and even single terms show up or hide based on conditions. If you use SOLIDWORKS, DriveWorks' paid tiers list creating documents such as sales quotes, purchase orders and BOMs; the free Xpress tier makes models and drawings but not those documents. Whatever the tool, the goal is one click to a clean, printable quote, with no leftover text from the last customer.
What to automate, and what stays with the sales engineer
| Software can do | The sales engineer keeps |
|---|---|
| Read the spec, email and drawings and pull out size, capacity, options and due date | Calling the customer when the spec doesn't make sense |
| Find the closest past jobs and show their BOM, cost, price and result | Picking which past job is really the right starting point |
| Draft the BOM from the template and the options | Approving the BOM and any part swaps |
| Send buyout price requests and read vendor replies | Choosing a vendor when prices or dates conflict |
| Flag what is new for engineering review | Deciding if a change is safe to quote without a full review |
| Roll up cost and suggest a price from past wins and losses | Setting the final price and margin |
| Build the quote document and carry the data into the order when it is won | Sending the quote and owning the customer relationship |
The rule we use: software drafts, a person approves. No quote goes to a customer until a sales engineer clicks send.
Tools compared
| Approach | Good at | Limits |
|---|---|---|
| CPQ software (for example Epicor CPQ, Salesforce CPQ, Experlogix, Tacton) | Guided option picking with rules, pricing, approvals and quote documents. Some generate CAD drawings and BOMs. | Every product and rule has to be modeled up front and kept current. Truly new designs still go to engineering. Setup is a real project for a mid-size maker with many one-off jobs. |
| Your ERP's configurator (for example Acumatica, Epicor Kinetic) | Rules that build a BOM, routing and price that flow straight into the sales order and job | Same modeling work as CPQ. Mostly used by inside staff. Doesn't read emailed specs or vendor replies. |
| Spreadsheet templates | Cheap, fast to start, easy for engineers to change | Copies drift. Prices go stale. Only the person who built it trusts it. Data has to be retyped into the ERP. |
| Custom automation around your systems | Reading specs and emails, finding past jobs, drafting BOMs and quotes in the tools you already use, chasing vendor prices | It is a project. It needs an owner, access to your ERP and files, and clean enough past-job data. |
Epicor says its CPQ can generate CAD drawings and attach them to CRM estimates and pass orders through to ERP. That is strong when your product line fits a rules model. If most of your jobs are "like the last one, but different," a full rules model can take longer to build than the quotes it saves. In that case it is often faster to start with past-job reuse and a simple option matrix, then adding rules where the same choices come up again and again.
How to measure it
- Days from request to quote sent. Pull the last 20 quotes from your email or CRM and count the days. That is your baseline.
- Hours of engineering per quote. Ask engineers to log quote time for two weeks.
- Days waiting on buyout prices. From the first vendor request to the last price in.
- Revisions per quote. Each revision is a sign the first pass missed something.
- Win rate by how fast you quoted. Split your won and lost quotes by turnaround time. Your own numbers will tell you more than any industry average.
- Quote-to-order errors. How often the BOM or price changes after the order is won.
Common mistakes
- Buying a configurator before writing down the options. Software can't model rules nobody has written down.
- Running buyout pricing after engineering. It doubles the wait for no reason.
- Making engineering review the whole machine every time. Review the change.
- Quoting from stale costs. A fast quote at last year's motor price loses money.
- Letting the quote and the order drift apart. If the won quote gets retyped into the ERP, the same errors come back at order entry.
- Letting software send quotes. Drafts are fine. Sending is a person's call.
How Peekgentic does it
We build custom quoting automation around the ERP, CAD files and folders you already use. The software reads the spec and the customer email, finds your closest past jobs, and drafts the BOM and the quote. It flags what is new for engineering, sends buyout price requests to your usual vendors and reads their replies. The sales engineer reviews it, sets the price and sends it. When the quote is won, the same data becomes the order, so nobody types it twice.
For a Garland manufacturer, one desk process went from 4 hours to 15 minutes, and they've saved over $100K in under 8 months.
What you need before you start
- Twenty recent quotes, won and lost, with their final BOMs if you have them.
- Your product families and the options people pick most.
- Your usual vendors for the big buyout parts.
- Your current quote template, and the system the order has to land in. You keep it.
We build this for you. Custom software built around how your team already works: order processing, purchasing, parts and service orders, reports, AI assistants and more. A person approves every step, and nothing has to be replaced. See what we build →
Common questions
How do I quote custom machinery faster?
Start every quote from the closest past job, pick options from a written option matrix, send buyout price requests to vendors on day one, and send engineering only the parts that are new. Then generate the BOM and the quote document from that data instead of retyping it.
What is engineered-to-order (ETO) quoting?
It is quoting equipment that is designed, at least in part, for one customer's spec. Unlike a stock part, the quote needs someone to decide what to build, build a BOM, price bought parts and set a lead time before a price is possible.
Is CPQ worth it for a mid-size custom equipment maker?
It can be, if your products fit a set of base designs and options that repeat. CPQ needs every product and rule modeled and kept current, and truly new designs still go to engineering. If most jobs are one-offs, past-job reuse and a simple option matrix often pay off sooner.
Can software build the BOM for a custom machine?
It can draft one. Configurators in ERPs like Acumatica build a BOM and routing from rules, and custom automation can start from the closest past job's BOM and swap parts by option. An engineer or sales engineer should still approve it.
How do I get vendor prices on buyout parts faster?
Send requests to your usual vendors as soon as the base and options are known, all at the same time. Use your ERP's request for quote feature where vendors will use it, and have software read the vendors who reply by email.
Can I automatically generate a printable quote document?
Yes. CPQ tools such as Salesforce CPQ build dynamic quote PDFs, and DriveWorks' paid tiers create sales quotes from SOLIDWORKS designs. Custom automation can fill your own Word or PDF template from the quote data.
Does this work for industrial distributors quoting parts?
Yes. Distributors quoting engineered parts and assemblies follow the same steps: read the request, match it to past quotes and items, get vendor prices, and draft the response for a rep to approve.
Will automation send quotes without a person checking?
Ours doesn't. Software drafts the quote and BOM, and a sales engineer reviews it, sets the price and sends it.
Sources
- Cincom, How CPQ Automates Bill of Materials for Complex Products, April 16, 2026 (vendor-published)
- Experlogix, CPQ for Manufacturing: From Complex Configuration to Production-Ready Orders, Aug. 20, 2026 (vendor-published)
- Acumatica, Product Configurator (product page), checked Oct. 18, 2026
- Epicor CPQ, How Epicor CPQ Works (product page), checked Oct. 18, 2026
- Oracle NetSuite Help, Vendor Request for Quote, checked Oct. 18, 2026
- Microsoft Learn, Enter and compare RFQ bids and award contracts (Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management), June 2025
- Salesforce Trailhead, Salesforce CPQ: Generate PDF Quotes, checked Oct. 18, 2026
- DriveWorks Help, DriveWorks Feature Comparison, checked Oct. 18, 2026
Automated quoting for manufacturers and machine shops
How to automate RFQ responses for a distributor
How to automate purchase orders